Home / Notes

What a repetitive job really costs

4 October 2026 · 1 min read · Barrie Moran

"It only takes an hour" is the most expensive sentence in business.

An hour is nothing. An hour every Friday, for two people, all year, is something else. Here's the sum I use, and it fits on the back of an envelope.

The sum

Hours each time × people × times a year = hours a year.

For "times a year", I use 46 working weeks (a year, less holidays and bank holidays) or 230 working days. They're round enough to argue about and close enough to be useful.

So a report that takes two people four hours every Friday:

4 hours × 2 people × 46 weeks = 368 hours a year

That's roughly ten weeks of one person's full-time work, on one report.

Putting a price on it

Multiply by what an hour of staff time costs you, all-in. Salary is only part of it; employer's National Insurance, pension, holiday and the desk they sit at all count. If you're not sure, your accountant can give you a figure.

What the number is for

The number isn't what you'll save. Some jobs shrink to a few minutes; some only lose the boring half. What the number does is tell you where to look first and how much it's worth spending to fix it.

If a job costs you thousands a year and fixing it costs less than that, it's worth a conversation. If it costs a few hundred, leave it alone and look for a bigger one.

The time-leak audit runs this sum across every job you tick, so you can see which ones are worth the bother.

Next step

Find out where
your week goes.

Three minutes, no email needed to see the answer. The audit adds up the hours your team spends on jobs a machine could do, and shows what that costs.